In the context of interpersonal relationships, "the three components of love, according to the triangular theory, are an intimacy component, a passion component, and a decision/commitment component." I mean, you could list example after example without breaking a sweat. Let’s say that Jess actually dies in the storm, or is close to death. Jess1 yells out – I SAW SOMEONE… and Greg runs off to find out who it is. Take a second to support Taylor Holmes on Patreon! But looking back at it, you are right. For me a huge part of the story is her inability to come to terms with the fact that raising her son alone and keeping her friends alive are tasks she is incapable of doing. An interesting observation is that the drums of the band that is playing when Jess crashes into the truck have the initials of the Aeolus on them. Well, normally, I try to keep the suspense of the movie and reveal the inner locking tricks at the end in the theories section… but with this one, we open with an extraordinarily important line. There, giving up all longings and all purpose is what leads u to nirvana, to salvation, to heaven – Clinging to them – be it for selfish or altruistic reasons – is the hell of live. I also read somewhere that the ship approaches them from two different directions in two different scenes at 21:29 and at 43:04. But I can’t contain myself dangit. The 8 types of love you can build with the triangular love theory 1. My issue was with Jess. In a nutshell, the Triangular Theory of Love defines “love” as being composed of 3 qualities, passion, intimacy, and commitment. I’ve been given a lot of crap for loving this, but your write up is inspiring another watch. It is off the coast of Florida, and the movie is called Triangle. 1- are the characters on the boat real people or fictional and are just part of the ongoing suffering of loops that jess has become part of? I agree with Gressi. This immutableness will be the biggest discussion and debate in the comments I am sure. Aghast at what has just happened to the other me, and I run. “Jess, like you believe is an evil selfish mom and in during one of her anger fits at the above mentioned time, she actually kills her son. Like many others, I thought long and hard about this one, and then did some searching about it to see what other people thought and there is plenty out there. Wherein a similar revolving plotline ensued, and the only way out was for the protagonist to make peace with his death. Also instead of counting every revolution ( in Ur case) as a seperate look, I think the three of them come together to form one big loop. It isn’t until she’s standing in her own way when she gets back to the house that she takes that step, so she can replace the old version with herself. And then at the end of the first iteration when Jess (the one who survives) comes back to her house (also back in time) there would be “Dress” Jess and Tommy in the house. I always wondered though, why couldn’t she just shoot from the ship down to them on the over-turned yacht before they even board? After she kills the reminders, she must go straight to the source and kill herself. “Until everyone is dead?” And now she’s determined to kill everyone. View production, box office, & company info. She defends her friends in the theater. So what was she doing while our Jessie defended herself against Vic and people got shot in the theater? Blam! To constantly struggle to get out of the loop and perpetually fail, only to watch the boulder roll back to the bottom of the ocean all over again? Great question. 123 of 188 people found this review helpful. ~Why would dead jess be randomly wearing a different outfit to the one she wore ‘as’ she died..? There for creating and causing her unending hell. No appearance in the dining room (where our Jesse “breaks” the loop later) nor in the theater. But could it be that Heather was just a surrogate for Jess? hahaha. When they are driving away, Tommy screams because of a truck headed right for them. What I write makes sense to me but may not make sense to somebody else, or there may be an obvious mistake that is not so obvious to me. Her quest to save her son keeps her existing cause it gives her a reason to go on – but not in a positive way. Is that is what is happening here? In the context of the triangular theory, the intimacy component refers to those feelings in a re-lationship that promote closeness, bondedness, and connected-ness. The sinister and determined Jess with the blood-covered face: where did she come from? I’m sure there is so much I have missed. I’m sure 99% of that was wrong. Melissa George is , and the story is amazing. Poor guy, still waiting on his fare to return…, Taylor – great write up on this movie – To begin with, I was lucky enough to find your website a few weeks back and start watching your recommendations – And then being able to come and read your review and all the comments has made watching these moves extremely enjoyable – We have the same taste in movies – I love these obscure mind blowing movies but find it difficult to review them with any of my friends (They hate them or simply have no desire to watch) – So thanks for bringing me this movie and review, Not being able to close the loop in this movie has driven me crazy – So this is my attempt to make the loop make sense, The very first Prime Jess – She is an abusive, mentally unstable waitress who just wants a day off – She has plans for the day with Greg on his boat and is bringing Tommy – We all see her condition that day, she is already off her rocker beating her son for breaking a toy and spilling some juice – I think this is when she snapped and cross the line into insanity – Instead of only hitting her son, I think this is when she killed him – The things we hear her saying about nightmares and hugging him, it is all from her perspective – She is comforting a corpse, At this point she has lost her mind – Blocked out the murder and everything that happened and gets in a cab and goes down to the harbor – I definitely agree with the idea of this cab driver being death and the cause of this loop as punishment and eventually as her test to acknowledge what she just did and accept responsibility, Before getting on the boat and while on the boat – all the evidence is there that she is way gone – In her mind, she sent Tommy to school and is enjoying her day off on the boat, As the events on the ship conclude – Her motivation is to get home to her son – Within her loop, she had the good fortune to get home in the past prior to the original dress Jess killing Tommy – All I can really confirm is: It is a good movie. But another option is that Jess’s loop allows a myriad of permutations and deviations from the norm, but never allow her out of the loop. I love it THAT much and your analysis pretty much sums it up. But we have already take one pair of Jess and Tommy out of the loop hopefully. No matter what though, she can’t escape her son’s death. Each component contributes to the overall experience of love. A lady takes a boat trip with her friends, they get hit by a storm, and everything goes nuts from there. But, they died first starting this cycle, so no matter how many times she tries it has an inevitable conclusion. Yeah, the incestuous stories of Greek and Roman mythologies have always intrigued me. And Jess is the one that actually dies? If you pause at that shot and look at the man’s watch it reads…8:17 (you’ll also notice Tommy’s shirt, which has a triangle on it, one of many triangle tie-ins). Too many words. Death says, “There is no point trying to save the boy,” trying to coax Jess into not getting on the boat again. Hahah. Maybe it’s just a symbol for Jess working out the fact that she is dying and needs to let go. Heather said she slept for a couple hours, so let’s assume she woke up around 11. But Jess2 totally changes the loop! She isn’t suppose to be there in the first place. The brilliant movie Triangle. “I want to go home!” She states now realising that she misses her boy. But are there more to these individual players? The chase turns into a unique, surprising and mind-bending exploration of love, fate, identity and time travel taboos. How did the loop have a possibility of ever beginning if dress Jess is always killed by her looping self… Mind actually blown. Just completely disappears. * Because if Tommy was to stay in the house or in school than the Jess who survives and returns to her house only to kill her “Dress” self wouldn’t have to do so. It’s a crash with eastern philosophy. KENNY! But death’s meter is running and the longer she avoids the fact that she is supposed to die already, she tries to cheat death and make a promise she can’t keep. Actually, it’s not fair at all, because The Invisible Guest is right up an Agatha Christie lover’s alley. Just kill them right away and jump overboard? She tries to save Sally. This is great. At 43:07 you can see her sweater is blue but at 1:28:10 she has on a red sweater. Just kidding. This movie/storyline is so complex and genuinely a movie that makes you think. Maybe, but to determine this we probably have to come to a conclusion as to why Jess is in the loop in the first place. Someone is intent on hunting them down, one by one. A soldier wakes up in someone else's body and discovers he's part of an experimental government program to find the bomber of a commuter train within 8 minutes. Triangle is an extraordinarily complex setup, with a complex set of inner-locking rules that you think you are constantly breaking, but you actually aren’t. Than watch this movie to shift the pattern of understanding the reality.Have a nice loop ;-). Awful. So this woman starts killing everyone of her friends instead of simply going to meet them when they come on the ship and telling them what is happening. YAY! Great question. Liking. I have spent days researching about every possible theory concerning this movie. In the case of the seagull however, the seagull cannot be hit by her car a week ago because all this happened on the same day! None of the others are part of any loop. As Jess walks into the room with the phonograph, there is a wall clock behind her and the time, 8:17. But early on Heather tells Greg, yeah, I’m not interested either. The Sisyphean goes knowingly with stone to the uphill and when stone rolls down he forgets everything and again try to go up .This is my theory . None of the others are part of any loop. She is myopicly focusing on her own selfish needs and desires. She WILL relive her son’s death over and over and can’t do anything about it. Maybe, but seems to be lacking something. – On her way to the harbor she is killed in an accident. Her version of the events fit perfectly and explains it well. Other than this, the rest of the movie can be explained. Jess looks ominously at a seagul when on the sailboat. Cause this post is going to probably get kinda crazy really fast. Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for this analysis! And how do you explain the abandoned ship from the 30s with fresh food on the table? Researcher Robert Sternberg devised a model of love that breaks it down into three major components (which form the three points of the titular triangle): Intimacy. Copy link. Cathys are piling up elsewhere on the ship, and being conveniently recycled by gulls in this underworld’s judicial economy. They can all be combined in several different ways, but can also stand alone. The number of bodies of dead sallies and gulls shows the real meaning of this movie…the Buddha once said if we count the number of times we were born and died this whole earth will be a burial ground..and all the people that we meet on a regular basis could have been someone’s mother..father..brother..sister..therefore we are all related to one another..so the real mother and father in this birth is really not our own mother and father..you are all alone in this world. Her selfishness leads her to resent the time spent caring for her son and that her scant free time is being “wasted” on catering to him. 2) Components of Love What is love - Intro to Psychology What is passion? ... Film and Movies (15234) Gynecology and Obstetrics (63) Health Informatics (118) Health Services (94) Healthcare Administration (266) History of Medicine (73) Infectious Disease Medicine (609) Internal Medicine (356) Medical Billing And Coding (21) So in the very first iteration when Jess was going to the harbour for the little trip (assuming she decides to wear shorts and sweater) was she supposed to take Tommy with her? You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. I agree with your final theory. Can you make lists of movies in the same categories? I feel like her inability to kill herself is telling as well. We’d need some sort of clutch or something so we don’t grind the temporal gears! The aim was to create a story where what has happened and what will happen is not clear so that the viewers will turn to theorizing and making what they want out of the movie (like in Mullholland Drive, Jacobs Ladder, etc..) However, they did a bad job at it, leaving a lot of things unnecessarily hanging and having a lot of inconsistencies in the plot. The repetition. Which one? The Triangular Theory of Love or The Love Triad. I may watch it again just to see if I can figure it out but from your review and readers comments it looks like this has been done by persons much more qualified than myself with no success. Something.). Or could it be she just hasn’t found the right combination of actions and events that will eventually let her free, and we just haven’t seen it yet?? Okay, the loop has a start, right? And actually, the more I think about it, the more I realize just how hard pressed to dismantle it. I have had a similar experience, but with work and not children, so know how hard it is to realize when you’re beat. Well, remember when our favorite cast walk onto the boat and begin discussing the name of the boat, The Aeolus? After reading everything here and elsewhere, her description made me go -ah ha- and satisfied my curiousity. But what if, we were close… but not quite there with theory 3? 2. But whatever. If the father had stuck around instead of abandoning her to a task she obviously could not do alone and that emotionally drained her maybe things would have been different. ), or you and your partner might complete the assessment separately and then discuss your results. I just watched the triangle and it leaves me confused so I searched for the triangle explained.Thanks to your theories at least I’m not so confused anymore right now.haha! Hey there. Yes, she did drop the key. Or not. They seem to see someone? That is if there is a loop at all. I can offer another theory though. Or maybe the movie just wanted to show us how bad a lot of single mothers are. So this big loop keeps recurring over and over again. But first, if you haven’t seen the movie… um yeah, you need to leave fairly quickly. Maybe? I just can’t say enough about this film. Nonlove. Because it is the laziest of the lazy explanations possible. If she dose not. However, I don’t think Jess intentionally killed Victor with the nail. This sums up her life with her child who is autistic and she does say in the film that he can’t deal with change. So how can that be what it’s about. This movie has messed with my head. I think what you said is well spotted. A lot of things would snap together if this were true. She was a terrible mother and while wanting a break is reasonable, I still think she is guilty of her son’s death and this is her personal hell which she deserved. As for the superfluous characters who travel with her I am totally lost. A brilliant psychologist named Robert Sternberg created the triangular theory of love. Then later on when wearing the bag, she hesitates long enough to give her other self the opportunity to escape. Jess has fears about her son Tommy. The festival of colours wouldn't be complete without the perfect dance playlist for your Holi party. Based off of his psychological research at Yale University, this theory seeks to define different elements of interpersonal relationships and to illustrate how these can combine to … Even if there are, they should not be in various stages of decomposition (similar to what we see on the boat). He had already been dead and she was in the process of dying. Interview with The Devil All the Time Scribe Paulo Campos!! She believes she deserves a day off. hahahaha. Until I come to another room, where there is another Caterpillar, and you know what it does? Something like that. Right? The triangular theory of love is a theory of love developed by Robert Sternberg.In the context of interpersonal relationships, "the three components of love, according to the triangular theory, are an intimacy component, a passion component, and a decision/commitment component.". The following is what I collected from my first watch, but I believe I’m not mistaken in the few things I’d like to point out. The last time she probably murdered all of them in a different way. The insanity. She can either keep driving on to the afterlife of peace or she can go to the harbour which represents the tormenting hell. I just saw this movie and like the way the you break it down. Don’t worry… I’ll call them out clearly. I actually kind of believe that this is why the movie is rated so low, people don’t want to come to terms with the fact that mothers are imperfect human beings and not tireless super humans.
Brazilian Grand Prix 2019, Mini 14 Dayz Standalone, M100 Master Vs, Windows 7 Bluetooth Not Working, Gerda Lerner Women's History, Dumb Laws In Scotland, Israeli Nba Players 2020, Country Life Vitamin D3 Recall, Hair Png 2020, Etl Framework Python, Huntington Bank Maternity Leave, Parallel Monsters Movie,